Wednesday, 8 May 2013

Mock exemplar 25/30 B1

-->
Film censorship is motivated by fears about audiences and technologies.” Discuss this statement in reference to the concerns expressed about uncensored and unregulated video content in Britain in the early 1980s. [30 marks]

Film censorship was put in place to both protect audiences and to try and conquer the power of technology in relation to illegal distribution of unregulated films in the early 1980's. Although, this was not fully the sole reason why film censorship was put in place. Margaret Thatcher, Mary Whitehouse, the rise of home video and piracy along with cinemas losing money were all things that influenced film censorship.
Good intro, main contexts addressed

During the 1980s there was a significant rise in the use of home video, people saw this new craze as fashionable and as a status symbol. The two home video systems were VHS and Betamax - who were competing in format wars against each other. This eventually saw VHS win this war, with the defining aspect that VHS had a longer tape recording of 3 hours, compared to Betamax with a recording time of 60 minutes. Nevertheless, the rise of both home video systems allowed much more efficient piracy for audiences and unlimited access to unregulated films.
Good Film censorship was not able to rule out these unregulated films and cinemas began losing money because people were staying at home and watching films, instead of the cinema.  That they couldn't see in the cinema such as these low budget Horror Films

The early 1980s resulted in many video nasties being made and consequently banned by the BBFC. Good A common occurrence with these videos was that they were horrors usually with quite graphic content. Initially many of these films were banned in cinemas, but with home video people could watch them at home - regardless of the audiences age. There was moral panic with the conservative party (who were in charge at the time. Margaret Thatcher who led the party at the time used home video as a scapegoat to blame for the UK's problems of the time. What sort of problems were in the UK? Video nasties were seen as a threat in influencing people to go and copy what they saw from these films. Also these films were spreading messages the government did not agree with and the conservative party being right-wing wanted to have control over what audiences were watching. Good – 'Moral Panic'

The BBFC were the actual group who enforced the 1984 Video Recordings Act which banned many video nasties. Excellent Initially video nasties were banned in cinema, but there was not really a rule to deny their distribution through home video. The recording act meant that all films including video nasties had to be sent to the BBFC for classification. At the time the BBFC were quite lenient with films Good and were more influenced by the conservative party who were consistently linking video nasties to nearly everything negative that was going on in Britain. Screenings of video nasties were shown to both conservative party members, as well as the National Viewers and Listeners Association, who feared these films would lead to people acting them out in real life.

Film censorship is partly motivated by audiences as the government did genuinely believe people would be more likely to commit the acts they saw in video nasties. Technology is a huge factor as without home video, video nasties could not be watched. Looking at today's cinema, many of these video nasties have went onto become hugely successful and many of them have been re-made and distributed in cinema, this is because they have a guaranteed pre-sold audience and this shows that the government of today would not censor these films as they would be economically successful in cinema. Also 'video nasties' are basically non-existent in today's film as so many films are such graphic and violent (The Human Centipede), audiences have become de-sensitized to them. I do not believe films should be censored as they are a matter of audiences personal choice, argument – good if you don't like something don't watch it. Their was no real evidence and there still is not that video nasties are/ have been corrupting society as The 1984 Video Recordings Act did not lessen crime or boost morale values in society. Interesting position...

Points are explained in detail & related to the question fully
All major contexts & events/institutions involved are included
A sense of argument around the debate is present
A good intro that answers the question

25/30

5.4 Lesson Plan: Digital Cinema Distribution






 


Task






What a Projectionist did...& what they do now but without needing any skill

Exit Pass - Digital Cinema Network

Homework/Classwork for Thursday 9th May

 
1. Work your way through the activities 
>Bluewater films in 4 categories
>Make notes on the contexts affecting the Digital Film Network (who, what, why?) 

2. Write an 300 word response to this question 


>Include 3 points - economic, social & technological

>Include a conclusion - has it succeeded in encouraging a more diverse screening of films? Is digital cinema improving the quality of the cinema experience (rather than having a human professional projectionist or movies or organic reels of 'film')

Saturday, 27 April 2013

Lesson 5.3 UK Digital Screen Network - an AS Student's view

Starter:

What films are being screened - research & categorise

Mainstream
Independent
Foreign (subtitled)/
Specialist/Classics

Do they give their audience a diverse range of films?

Question - how is this impacted by the Digital Screen Network/Digital Distribution?





Digital screen network
1). What is the digital screen network?
It is a £12 million investment, a national lottery investment which equips 240 screens in 210 cinemas across the uk with digital projection technology which gives the audiences a greater choice of film.

2). How can it help independent producers and exhibitors like picture house?
It will help independent producers and exhibitors like picture house because it enables them to distribute a vaster amount of films across their screens, which will therefore increase their audience numbers. It also increases the amount of times that one film is shown and enables them to show a greater selection of films which appeals to a wide variety of people and specialized films that are not generic hollywood films.

3). What will it mean for audiences?
It will mean that audiences get the chance to watch a wider variety of films, such as critically acclaimed films. It also means that film distribution can be increased as it is cheaper to reproduce the films as they are digital as opposed to 35 mm film, which is very expensive to reproduce.

4). How does your local area benefit?
My local area benefits from this as two out of the three cinemas in the city have one digital screen each. One of the cinemas is independent and one is mainstream. This benefits my local area, because it enables local people to be able to watch specialized films, which are of interest to the local people it also will increase the number of people who use those particular cinemas, because films are shown more often, therefore helping the entertainment industry and the local economy.

5). How does it impact on your film consumption?
The use of digital screen technology impacts my individual film consumption, as it offers a wider variety of times for me to watch the film, it also allows me to be able to see independent films that i may not have otherwise been able to watch.

6). What will this technology also provide to cinemas?
The technology will increase the amount of people who use the cinema, therefore increasing its profits, it will also bring the cinema a wider audience base and have a more varied audience. 
 
Arguments from an AS student (at a rival 6th form college)
 
New digital cinema production affects the films and other products that cinema city and vue produce and distribute, because digital technology enables the cinemas to screen more films, because it is cheaper to use digital technology as opposed to a 35mm films reel, which is extremly costly and difficult to use. Digital technology also enables the cinema to screen 3D films, which widens the audience and gives them a unique selling point. The use of digital technology, enable the cinemas to exhibit a wider vairety and more screenings of each films, therefore increasing the audience and increasing profits that the cinemas and the films make. It affects how the audience consumes the product because it offers the audience a wider variety of films to watch and the experience of 3D and watching live streaming concerts and sporting matches at the cinema. 
 
This enable us to increase our individual consumption of films, because of the increasing ways in which we can access them, however this also has its disadvantages because it will decrease the conventional ways to watch a film and will decrease profits made by cinemas and film companies, therefore leading to a decrease in film making within the film industry. Piracy is has an effect on our consumption of films, because although it is exploiting the film company, directors and actors, however it increases people film consumption. Although it increases the amount of people who watch the film, it does not increase the profits that are made, because people are getting it on dvd or downloading the film illegally.

From my own personal viewpoint i believe that the digital cinema production is effecting the british film industry, in both good and bad ways. I think that the introduction of digital technology into cinemas, is a good point as it increases the amount of films and screenings you can show at a cinema, because they are cheap and easy to use as opposed to 35 mm film, which is expensive and was difficult to use. I also think that digital technology is better, because of the diversity and advancements that it has, which diversifies what the cinema has to offer to its audiences. Although, i think that the advancements in the media, could possibly decrease the amount of people who go to the cinema and also increase piracy, because of the variety of ways that you can play films.